The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on Monday, November 2, accused California's state and local authorities of releasing nearly 24,000 people from jail since January 20, 2025, after declining to honour detainer requests lodged by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). In a statement issued from Washington, the department said the non-honoured detainers were associated with more than 81,000 criminal charges or convictions, and it blamed Governor Gavin Newsom and what it called California's 'sanctuary politicians' for the releases.

Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Nearly 24,000People DHS says California released despite ICE detainers since Jan. 20, 2025
81,000+Criminal charges or convictions DHS links to those detainers
169Homicides among the charges/convictions listed by DHS
1,088Drug-trafficking charges listed by DHS

DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin said in the statement: 'Governor Gavin Newsom and his cronies in California have turned the Golden State into a hotbed of illegal alien crime. Sanctuary politicians have not only refused to cooperate with federal law enforcement to target and arrest the worst of the worst – but they've released nearly 24,000 criminal illegal aliens onto the streets of California.' Mullin added that 'the Trump Administration will always put the American people first.' The figures and the characterisations in the statement are DHS's own; the department did not publish the underlying jail-by-jail records with the statement, and the numbers have not been independently verified.

Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security

Beyond the 169 homicides, DHS said the charges or convictions tied to the non-honoured detainers included 147 sexual assaults, 1,088 drug-trafficking charges, 1,097 assaults and 3,295 burglaries. News coverage of the statement by Jurelist reported the same totals, the same breakdown and the same named cases, confirming the contents of the federal release.

Source: Jurelist

What an ICE detainer actually is

An ICE detainer is a request — not a court order or a judicial warrant — asking a state or local jail to notify ICE before releasing a person in its custody and, in many cases, to hold that person for up to 48 hours beyond their release date so federal officers can take custody. California's state sanctuary law, the California Values Act, limits when state and local agencies may cooperate with federal immigration enforcement, and detainer disputes between Sacramento and Washington have been a running legal and political fight for years. Monday's statement is the Trump administration's latest and largest numerical attack on that California framework.

The cases DHS named, county by county

DHS named individual cases it said illustrated the policy. In Los Angeles County, it said, Ursulo Montenegro Martinez was released after a detainer lodged on June 23, 2025, despite a record DHS listed as including negligent manslaughter with a weapon and narcotics offences; Taron Gorgoyan was released after a March 6, 2026 detainer, with DHS listing convictions including voluntary manslaughter and identity theft; and Salvador Jesus Serpas-Hernandez, whom DHS described as a Rebels 13 gang member, was released after an April 1, 2026 detainer, with DHS listing convictions including murder and cruelty to a child. These case details are DHS's account of each record.

Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security

The department gave similar examples from other counties: Samuel Darling Cruz Florino, released in Sacramento County after a June 1, 2026 detainer, with DHS listing convictions including voluntary manslaughter and kidnapping; Ahmed Elgehmbri in Amador County after an April 22, 2026 detainer; Jose Perez Chaparro-Chaparra in Contra Costa County after a March 16, 2026 detainer; Wilber Ismael Ortez-Ramos in San Mateo County after a June 3, 2026 detainer; and Carlos Alberto Amaya-Velasquez in San Francisco County after a May 14, 2026 detainer. DHS said each man was released after the county declined the detainer.

Source: U.S. Department of Homeland Security

The trucking and CDL thread running through the statement

A second part of the DHS statement will land directly with Punjabi trucking families. DHS again cited a series of fatal or serious semi-truck crashes in which it said the driver held a California commercial driver's licence (CDL) and was in the United States unlawfully — including, it said, a September case in Ontario, California, involving Chamkaur Singh; a May case near Lodi involving Manvir Singh; a June 2024 multi-vehicle pileup in San Bernardino involving Partap Singh; and cases outside California in Ohio, Indiana, Oregon and Florida in which DHS said California-issued CDLs were involved. Those crash cases are separate criminal matters; Monday's statement used them to attack California's licensing and sanctuary policies together. Each individual case remains subject to its own court process, and the allegations in them must be read as allegations until a court decides.

Read the numbers with care

Every figure in this story — the nearly 24,000 releases and the 81,000 charges or convictions — comes from DHS's own November 2 statement. A detainer being 'not honoured' covers a range of situations under California law, and a charge is not a conviction. Governor Newsom's office had not issued a response carried in the sources reporting the statement at the time of publication.

Why this matters for Punjabi and immigrant families in California

California is home to the largest Punjabi community in the United States, concentrated in the Central Valley — Fresno, Sacramento, Stockton, Modesto, Bakersfield and Yuba City — and in the Los Angeles and Bay Area counties named in the DHS list. The detainer fight cuts both ways for those families: serious-crime cases fuel demands for closer jail-to-ICE cooperation, while immigration advocates warn that wider detainer compliance sweeps up people whose cases are minor or unresolved and discourages immigrant communities from reporting crime. Monday's statement, issued on the eve of the November 3 midterm elections, ensures the argument will stay at the centre of California politics.

What happens next

DHS announced no new regulation or operation alongside the statement; it is a political and policy broadside, and any change would have to come through federal enforcement practice, Congress, the courts or a change in California law. Expect the Newsom administration and California counties to dispute the federal framing, federal officials to keep publishing case lists, and the CDL cases cited by DHS to continue through criminal courts in several states. Awaaz Punjab will update this story if the Governor's office or the named counties respond with their own figures.