RALEIGH, N.C. — A Wake County sheriff's deputy has been fired and arrested by his own office, accused of using law-enforcement databases to find people with active felony warrants and warn them before deputies could reach them. Anthony Garcia, 29, was arrested without incident on Thursday, November 5, at the John H. Baker Jr. Public Safety Center in Raleigh, the Wake County Sheriff's Office said in a press release reported by WPTF.

Source: WPTF, reporting Wake County Sheriff's Office

Garcia is charged with one count of obstruction of justice and one count of accessing government computers for fraud, WPTF reported. In court documents, the sheriff's office said Garcia allegedly used law-enforcement databases on government computers to find active felony warrants and warn suspects. The charges are allegations: Garcia is presumed innocent unless proven guilty in court, and he was due in court on Friday, November 6, WRAL reported.

Source: WRAL News

29Age of former Wake County deputy Anthony Garcia
Aug. 2020When Garcia was hired by the Wake County Sheriff's Office
2Counts charged: obstruction of justice; accessing government computers for fraud
Nov. 5, 2026Date of Garcia's arrest at the John H. Baker Jr. Public Safety Center

How the case began, according to the sheriff's office

According to the sheriff's office press release, investigators received information alleging that a deputy had improperly used government property. The office says it acted as soon as it learned of the allegations, opened an investigation, and arrested Garcia at its own public safety centre — the county's central law-enforcement building in downtown Raleigh — without incident. The office also fired him: WPTF's report describes Garcia as a former deputy facing the charges, and Sheriff Willie Rowe's statement frames the response as immediate.

Source: WPTF, reporting Wake County Sheriff's Office

"Once we were made aware of these allegations, we took immediate action and launched an investigation," Sheriff Willie Rowe said. "As law enforcement officers we are entrusted with tools and information to be used to serve and safeguard our community. These resources are not for any other purpose, and we will not tolerate any conduct that compromises the trust placed in us or the integrity of this office. Our office remains focused on serving Wake County with professionalism, integrity, and the highest ethical standards."

Source: Sheriff Willie Rowe, via WPTF

Why warrant databases are restricted

Active warrant information sits inside restricted law-enforcement databases precisely because of the risk the sheriff's office alleges here: a person who knows a felony warrant is active can flee, hide, or prepare for the deputies coming to serve it, and officers approaching someone who has been warned face a different — and potentially more dangerous — encounter than officers approaching someone who has not. That is why access to those systems is logged, limited to official duties, and treated as government property rather than a personal resource, and why alleged misuse is charged both as obstruction — interfering with the justice process itself — and as a computer-access offence.

Source: WPTF, reporting Wake County Sheriff's Office court documents

The law behind the computer charge

North Carolina's computer-crime statute, General Statute 14-454.1, makes it unlawful to willfully access a government computer to devise or execute a scheme to defraud, or to obtain property or services by false pretences — a Class F felony under subsection (a) — while willful, unauthorised access for other purposes is a Class H felony under subsection (b). Class F felonies in North Carolina carry a sentencing range of 10 to 41 months under the state's structured sentencing tables. The sheriff's office has charged Garcia with 'accessing government computers for fraud,' the wording of the fraud branch of that statute; the exact classification will be set out as his case moves through Wake County court, starting with Friday's appearance reported by WRAL.

Source: N.C. General Statute 14-454.1, via Justia

The second North Carolina database case in one week

Garcia's arrest is not the only North Carolina law-enforcement database case this week. In neighbouring Harnett County, a grand jury indicted former sheriff's detective Jayne Louise Holland, 45, on November 3 on a felony count of unlawfully accessing a government computer, plus misdemeanour counts over alleged misuse of the Flock automated licence-plate-reader system, according to the Sanford Herald, WRAL, WITN and WWAY. Holland was fired on September 15 after an internal investigation, the State Bureau of Investigation investigated at the sheriff's and district attorney's joint request, she surrendered on November 3 on a $5,000 bond, and she is due in Harnett County court on December 14, those outlets reported. The two cases involve different counties, different systems and different allegations — Holland's is licence-plate data said to have been used for personal reasons; Garcia's is warrant data allegedly used to warn suspects — but both turn on the same question Rowe posed in Raleigh: who watches the people entrusted with the tools.

Source: Triangle Local NC, reporting Sanford Herald, WRAL, WITN and WWAY

What has not been released

In the reporting reviewed for this story, the sheriff's office has not publicly named the suspects Garcia is accused of warning, said how many warrants were allegedly involved, or released a bond amount. Those details, if they exist, sit in the court file that begins with his Friday appearance.

What happens next

Garcia's case now moves into Wake County's courts, where Friday's first appearance is the opening step: the charges will be formally before a judge, and the court documents the sheriff's office has already cited will become the basis of the prosecution's case. His six years with the office — he was hired in August 2020, at about age 23 — are over regardless of the verdict, the office's firing makes that final. For Wake County's roughly 1.2 million residents, including the Raleigh community the office polices daily, the case is a test of the system Rowe described: whether an office that arrests one of its own, at its own headquarters, on its own complaint, can also show residents exactly how the alleged warnings happened and what has changed so they cannot happen again.

Source: WPTF